Ahp decision7/5/2023 ![]() ![]() Simulacija grupnog odlučivanja u izboru tehnologije navodnjavanja, Poljoprivreda između suša i poplava, 190-197, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Novi Sad. Srđević, B, Potkonjak, S., Srđević, Z., Škorić, M., & Zoranović, T. Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world, 2, RWS publications. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234–281. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York. European Journal of Operational Research, 79, 249–265. Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: an evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members’ weightages. Višekriterijumska optimizacija–metode, primena u logistici, softver, Vojnoizdavački zavod, Beograd. ![]() 9/9–9/1 scale method of the AHP, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the AHP, Pittsburgh, 197–202. Model za otklanjanje grešaka u sistemu procene performansi vojnih vozača, Doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet odbrane, Vojna akademija, Beograd. European Journal of Operational Research, 47, 293–305. Multi–criteria analysis and budget reallocation in long–term research planning. Lootsma, F.A., Mensch, T.C.A., & Vos, F.A. T French and the American school in multi–criteria decision analysis. NATO ASI Series F, Computer and System Sciences, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 57–88. Numerical scaling of human judgment in pairwise–comparison methods for fuzzy multi–criteria decision analysis, Mathematical Models for Decision Support. Analitički hijerarhijski proces kao podrška odlučivanju u vodoprivredi. Upravljanje izradom generalnih projekata u oblasti infrastrukture primenom višekriterijumske analize, Doktorska disertacija, Fakultet tehničkih nauka Univerziteta u Novom Sadu. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211–228. Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications–A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 165–169. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 153, 318–322.įorman E., & Peniwati K. A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorisation procedure. (In Serbian).Įscobar, M.T., Aguarón, J., & MorenoJiménez J.M. Rangiranje korisnika kredita za opremu za navodnjavanje pomoću Analitičkog hijerarhijskog procesa, Vodoprivreda, 42, 213-222. (In Serbian).īlagojević, B., Srđević, Z., Srđević, B., & Suvočarov, K. Minimizacija odstupanja grupne od individualne odluke primenom inteligentnih stohastičkih algoritama u problemima vodoprivrede i poljoprivrede, Doktorska disertacija, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Poljoprivredni fakultet, 15. European Journal of Operational Research, 232(3), 584–592.īlagojević, B. ![]() Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25, 1459–1469.īernasconi, M., Choirat, C., & Seri, R. (2010), Stakeholder ranking of watershed goals with the vector analytic hierarchy process: Effects of participant grouping scenarios. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1), 367–382.Īrnette, A., Zobel C., Bosch D., Pease J., & Metcalfe T. Bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making. Altuzarra A., Moreno-Jimenez J.M., & Salvador M.A. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |